Smooth, what a scorcher!
Posted on 24.07.08 by Matt @ 7:00 am

I think it’s fair to say that the FM licence awards that Ofcom have presided over haven’t exactly set the ratings world on fire. Indeed many of the stations are somewhat, er, off plan, from what’s in the application documents.

However, one station has bucked this trend spectacularly and they’ve just had their first RAJAR figures published – Smooth Radio North East.

Originally licensed as Saga, it was acquired, with its brothers and sisters, by GMG and launched as Smooth on January 8th 2008. In its application to Ofcom it said, by the end of year one, it would have 11% reach (which they said would equal 219,016 listeners) and 10.5 average hours (equating to 2,229,773 total hours) which would produce a 6.1% share.

Bearing in mind they’ve still got six months to go, the station’s actual figures are a 13% reach (275,00 listeners) and 9 average hours, resulting in a total hours of 2,467,000 and a market share of 5.9%. This, in a competitive marketplace, is a truly astounding launch and easily one of the most successful in recent times.

Why do other stations do so badly with their own launches? I don’t think it’s one thing – it’s a combination.

The first thing is noise.

In the olden days, a new radio station launch was big news! With only four channels on the box , less than 10 on the radio dial and no internet, a new radio station massively enhanced the amount of media a listener had.

Now there’s millions of channels and seemingly something new launches every day, no one really cares if something’s appeared on 107.1FM anymore.

Then there’s competition.

You have to remember that, already, 90% of the UK listen to the radio, for an average of 24 hours. This means that they’re actually quite satisfied with what their hearing. Now, i’m not saying that it can’t be improved or that there’s something else they would like to hear, but getting them to move off their dial is hard. This is especially the case if you’re playing in the mainstream. Radio 1 and Radio 2 do an amazing job, producing high quality programmes with high value talent and with no ads! And they’re positioned tightly next to each other with one targeting 15 to 34s and the other targeting 35 to 55s. When you add on commercial radio and local BBC stations with heritage, it makes it a difficult play.

Telling people what you do….

…is also very hard. I think few station launches have managed to spend enough money and spend it well enough too. Bus backs and some telly is definitely not going to provide cut through today. And it’s unlikely to combat the things listed above.

So, how have Smooth done it?

From an outside perspective, they’ve got a number of things going for them. Firstly, they’re targeting a demographic that’s not particularly well catered for on the radio – over 45s – and they’ve got a music policy that has very little competition on FM (From 3pm yesterday – Dionne Warwick, Beatles, KC & the Sunshine Band, Stereophonics, Supertramp, Sad Cafe, Beach Boys and the Bellamy Brothers). They also have a brand position that’s cemented by a Ronseal name – Smooth. You know what that’s going to be – and then when you tune in, they deliver it. Well. Additionally they spent money. Lots. About a million quid, with plenty on TV advertising and they has the support of a good print partner in their parent company too.



Remember you can get these straight to your inbox by entering your email address at the top right of this page. The RSS link is up there too.


Comments: 1 Comment

1 Comment »

  1. I have to say I almost expected Smooth to do this well. As you say it’s growth demographic and one that isn’t well catered for in the region. The 2 BBC locals have gone ‘younger’ possibly as a countermove prior to launch. But also what I have found is a lot people listening to smooth who I wouldn’t have expected to… but then it’s a relaxing listen, well put together and has stand out in a region of blandness.

    Comment by Rich — July 24, 2008 @ 8:55 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)



Matt Deegan is the Creative Director at Folder Media, a radio and new media consultancy that helps other people and develops its own social media, digital platforms and radio. You can contact him here. He also runs children's radio station Fun Kids.

Main Menu
Home
About Me
Contact Me

RSS Feed

Stalker Feed

Web2.0
Matt on Flickr
Matt on YouTube
Matt on MySpace
Matt on Facebook
Matt on LinkedIn
Matt on Twitter
Matt on Radiopop

Search

Links
Alan Mason
Ambrose Heron
Andrew Collins
Ashley Temple
Authentic Buzz
ASRA
Ben Metcalfe
Bern Leckie
Biz Stone
Caterina Fake
Chill Blog
Chris Evans
Chris Moyles
Dan Gillmor
Danny O'Brien
Dave Gorman
Dave Winer
David Madelin
David Galbraith
David Weinbeger
Euan Semple
Evan Williams
Frankie Roberto
Glenn Fleischman
Fun Kids
Ian and Leanne
Ian Forrester
Ian Joliet
James Boardwell
James Cridland
Janus Friis
Jason Calacanis
Jason Kottke
Jason Shellen
Jeremy Zawodny
John Baish
John Handelaar
John Ousby
Joi Ito
Lee Abrams
Mark Lucovsky
Malcom Gladwell
Mark Fletcher
Martin Belam
Matt Bidulph
Matt Cutts
Mike Davidson
Mike Hawkyard
Nick Denton
Nik Goodman
Nick Piggott
Nick Wallis
Om Malik
Open Rights Group
Paul Earwker
Paul McNally
Paul Smith
Mark Ramsey
Paul Easton
Richard Herring
Rob Manuel
Robert Scoble
Rod McKenzie
Sam Potts
Schulze & Webb
Simon Waldman
Simon Willison
Squeezypaws
Stewart Butterfield
Steve Martin
The Lock-in
Tim Berners-Lee
Tom Coates
Trevor Dann
Tristan Ferne
Will's Pub Guide
Zak de Luxe

Syndication
RSS

Credits and Copyright
Proudly powered by WordPress.
All content © 2005-2009 Matt Deegan

Email updates
Enter your email address to get new posts direct to your inbox:


Blog Posts I Like

Radio Listening
I'm currently enjoying: NME Radio
Website / Listen Live


Archives
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
April 2005

Recent Entries