<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Radio Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/</link>
	<description>Posts about radio, digital, media and the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79348</guid>
		<description>Grauniad: your comments here are abusive and stupid, and they are much more abusive and stupid than anything Steve Green has said here.

Under the circumstances, I think your choice of handle is regrettable. If you actually had anything to do with the Guardian, we&#039;d be extremely ashamed of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grauniad: your comments here are abusive and stupid, and they are much more abusive and stupid than anything Steve Green has said here.</p>
<p>Under the circumstances, I think your choice of handle is regrettable. If you actually had anything to do with the Guardian, we&#8217;d be extremely ashamed of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grauniad</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79246</link>
		<dc:creator>Grauniad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79246</guid>
		<description>You keep chugging down the profits from the industry you despise so much, Green. Keep it corporate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep chugging down the profits from the industry you despise so much, Green. Keep it corporate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79245</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79245</guid>
		<description>I said you&#039;re a troll - thanks for the confirmation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said you&#8217;re a troll &#8211; thanks for the confirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grauniad</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79244</link>
		<dc:creator>Grauniad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79244</guid>
		<description>A paranoid hypocrite. Christ, Green. How do you get out of bed in the morning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A paranoid hypocrite. Christ, Green. How do you get out of bed in the morning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79242</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79242</guid>
		<description>Matt, yes, I obviously would have preferred you to discuss what I&#039;d said rather than launch an unprovoked attack on my character - presumably just because you were annoyed at my quote in Jack Schofield&#039;s blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, yes, I obviously would have preferred you to discuss what I&#8217;d said rather than launch an unprovoked attack on my character &#8211; presumably just because you were annoyed at my quote in Jack Schofield&#8217;s blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79241</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79241</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that I somehow have to explain my actions just for making a few quid a week from carrying DAB adverts on my website (which hardly has bbc.co.uk traffic levels), yet we&#039;re commenting on a blog about the DRWG report, which contains recommendations for government that are totally against the interests of the public as a whole! Nothing like getting your priorities in the right order, Grauniad. It doesn&#039;t exactly make it very convincing that you&#039;re not a DAB industry member, as you claim.

The DRWG is basically recommending that everyone be pushed towards DAB, and Internet radio won&#039;t get a look-in, even though that&#039;s clearly against the best interests of the public, because Internet radio would clearly be more suitable for a sizeable percentage of the population due to the advantages that it already offers. 

And not content with just pushing everyone on to DAB without informing them about Internet radio as well, the DAB industry even wants government to give them taxpayers&#039; money to help them with DAB transmission costs - so the public is basically being mis-informed and then asked to pay for the privilege!! 

Right. Onto the DAB adverts. My website carries the odd DAB advert. So what? I&#039;ve put a huge amount of effort into my website, and I don&#039;t see why I shouldn&#039;t earn some money from it. I can&#039;t help what Google places in its ads - for all I know, the websites blocked could be replaced with new DAB adverts, so it would be impossible to block all DAB adverts. I&#039;m not going to remove the Google adverts just because someone in the DAB industry or who&#039;s a mate of someone in the DAB industry wants to accuse me of hypocrisy - look in the mirror before you can accuse me of hypocrisy, I could provide a list as long as your arm of DAB industry hypocrisies, and I don&#039;t see any display of guilt coming from the DAB industry.

As for the price comparison pages. They&#039;re helpful for search results, and they&#039;re probably helpful for visitors as well, so I&#039;m not going to remove these either. Ultimately, just like any website, what I want is traffic. They help with that (actually, my gut feeling is that they don&#039;t help all that much, but they&#039;ll help a bit). So if someone arrives at my website due to those pages who&#039;s under the impression that DAB is oh so wonderful due to the way the DAB industry advertises it, and then they start reading my website and see the truth, those pages have done their job admirably well, wouldn&#039;t you say, Grauniad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that I somehow have to explain my actions just for making a few quid a week from carrying DAB adverts on my website (which hardly has bbc.co.uk traffic levels), yet we&#8217;re commenting on a blog about the DRWG report, which contains recommendations for government that are totally against the interests of the public as a whole! Nothing like getting your priorities in the right order, Grauniad. It doesn&#8217;t exactly make it very convincing that you&#8217;re not a DAB industry member, as you claim.</p>
<p>The DRWG is basically recommending that everyone be pushed towards DAB, and Internet radio won&#8217;t get a look-in, even though that&#8217;s clearly against the best interests of the public, because Internet radio would clearly be more suitable for a sizeable percentage of the population due to the advantages that it already offers. </p>
<p>And not content with just pushing everyone on to DAB without informing them about Internet radio as well, the DAB industry even wants government to give them taxpayers&#8217; money to help them with DAB transmission costs &#8211; so the public is basically being mis-informed and then asked to pay for the privilege!! </p>
<p>Right. Onto the DAB adverts. My website carries the odd DAB advert. So what? I&#8217;ve put a huge amount of effort into my website, and I don&#8217;t see why I shouldn&#8217;t earn some money from it. I can&#8217;t help what Google places in its ads &#8211; for all I know, the websites blocked could be replaced with new DAB adverts, so it would be impossible to block all DAB adverts. I&#8217;m not going to remove the Google adverts just because someone in the DAB industry or who&#8217;s a mate of someone in the DAB industry wants to accuse me of hypocrisy &#8211; look in the mirror before you can accuse me of hypocrisy, I could provide a list as long as your arm of DAB industry hypocrisies, and I don&#8217;t see any display of guilt coming from the DAB industry.</p>
<p>As for the price comparison pages. They&#8217;re helpful for search results, and they&#8217;re probably helpful for visitors as well, so I&#8217;m not going to remove these either. Ultimately, just like any website, what I want is traffic. They help with that (actually, my gut feeling is that they don&#8217;t help all that much, but they&#8217;ll help a bit). So if someone arrives at my website due to those pages who&#8217;s under the impression that DAB is oh so wonderful due to the way the DAB industry advertises it, and then they start reading my website and see the truth, those pages have done their job admirably well, wouldn&#8217;t you say, Grauniad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79240</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79240</guid>
		<description>Steve, top of the page - &quot;Or in other words, you can’t dispute what I’ve just said...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, top of the page &#8211; &#8220;Or in other words, you can’t dispute what I’ve just said&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grauniad</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79239</link>
		<dc:creator>Grauniad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79239</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because you&#039;re a conflicted soul who can&#039;t understand the simple hypocrisy of promoting DAB radios to generate income and page rankings (by your own admission), on a site that&#039;s sole purpose is to criticise and admonish the industry. 

You&#039;re reaping benefits from the popularity of DAB radio. Define &quot;popularity&quot; how you will, but you believe the product is popular enough so that searches conducted for it will generate income and improve your search ranking.

The logic is robust, Green. It&#039;s pure, unadulterated hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because you&#8217;re a conflicted soul who can&#8217;t understand the simple hypocrisy of promoting DAB radios to generate income and page rankings (by your own admission), on a site that&#8217;s sole purpose is to criticise and admonish the industry. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re reaping benefits from the popularity of DAB radio. Define &#8220;popularity&#8221; how you will, but you believe the product is popular enough so that searches conducted for it will generate income and improve your search ranking.</p>
<p>The logic is robust, Green. It&#8217;s pure, unadulterated hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79238</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79238</guid>
		<description>Matt, when have I moaned at you about not engaging?

Re Grauniad, he&#039;s already made the same comments a few times, and I&#039;ve already responded to those comments, so I don&#039;t see the point in responding again. If he were on Usenet he&#039;d be labelled a troll anyway, because the fact that he just repeats the same things every time without actually discussing anything shows that he&#039;s just trying to make trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, when have I moaned at you about not engaging?</p>
<p>Re Grauniad, he&#8217;s already made the same comments a few times, and I&#8217;ve already responded to those comments, so I don&#8217;t see the point in responding again. If he were on Usenet he&#8217;d be labelled a troll anyway, because the fact that he just repeats the same things every time without actually discussing anything shows that he&#8217;s just trying to make trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2008/12/19/one-radio-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-79236</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=306#comment-79236</guid>
		<description>And you moan and me for not engaging with the discussion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you moan and me for not engaging with the discussion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

