<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling Off Radio 1. Again.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/</link>
	<description>Matt Deegan's home on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:14:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/comment-page-1/#comment-80133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=424#comment-80133</guid>
		<description>Good post Matt.

You&#039;re right - the &quot;sell-off Radio 1&quot; argument reappears with depressing regularity.

The BBC should try and provide a service to all its Licence payers, and Radio 1 seems integral to such a policy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Matt.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; the &#8220;sell-off Radio 1&#8243; argument reappears with depressing regularity.</p>
<p>The BBC should try and provide a service to all its Licence payers, and Radio 1 seems integral to such a policy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gellatly</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/comment-page-1/#comment-80128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gellatly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=424#comment-80128</guid>
		<description>Well said Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/comment-page-1/#comment-80127</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=424#comment-80127</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, the Tory Party has been back-pedalling by insisting that Vaizey&#039;s comments do not represent official party policy.

Rather than sell Radio 1, it should be sub-contracted out to a commercial operator on a lowest bid basis.  Bidders would quote a price at which they could maintain the same service commitments (in terms of overall output, format and public service obligations) on a commercial-free basis.  The sub-contractor would be accountable to BBC management for its performance, and ultimately accountable to the BBC Trust, but the competitive nature of the bid process (and the fact that the BBC itself would still own and pay for, but not be directly managing the station) would reduce costs and so enhance value for  money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, the Tory Party has been back-pedalling by insisting that Vaizey&#8217;s comments do not represent official party policy.</p>
<p>Rather than sell Radio 1, it should be sub-contracted out to a commercial operator on a lowest bid basis.  Bidders would quote a price at which they could maintain the same service commitments (in terms of overall output, format and public service obligations) on a commercial-free basis.  The sub-contractor would be accountable to BBC management for its performance, and ultimately accountable to the BBC Trust, but the competitive nature of the bid process (and the fact that the BBC itself would still own and pay for, but not be directly managing the station) would reduce costs and so enhance value for  money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.mattdeegan.com/2009/08/01/selling-off-radio-1-again/comment-page-1/#comment-80126</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattdeegan.com/?p=424#comment-80126</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more, I already emailed the party to complain about such a ridculous proposal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more, I already emailed the party to complain about such a ridculous proposal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
